What do you reckon?

Home
Archive
About
New
Top
Community
Could "Australia in One Room" be the "national conversation" the Government has promised?
Without a different kind of national conversation, major policy reform proposals are doomed to fall flat with the public again
 • 
Rachel Krust
CETA: Citizen Engagement Team of the Australian Public Service
Genuinely empowering the Australian Public Service requires equipping it with the resources to do innovative and meaningful citizen engagement
 • 
Rachel Krust
1
Reimagining civic participation in Australia: national civilian service
We stand to benefit enormously as individuals and as a society from more civic participation in Australia, but we first need to reimagine what it means
 • 
Rachel Krust
Beyond the loudest voices and immediate marketability: could deliberation get more good policy ideas on to the political agenda?
Too many transformative policy ideas get left off the political agenda because they're not sexy, shouted loudly or marketable enough. Deliberation could…
 • 
Rachel Krust
Reimagining civics education in Australia: participation in practice
We're not doing nearly enough to realise the Australian Curriculum's objective of creating "active and informed citizens". What could be a more…
 • 
Rachel Krust
1
Will independents call for a citizens' jury on political finance reform in Australia?
Political parties shouldn't be setting the rules of the political game, including the rules about political finance
 • 
Rachel Krust
1
Could large Australian philanthropies pilot a "deliberative grant-making" process?
Philanthropies are addressing fundamentally public problems but without much democracy
 • 
Rachel Krust
What do you reckon?
Opportunities to apply deliberative and participatory democracy in Australia

What do you reckon?

AboutArchiveSitemap
© 2023 Rachel Krust
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing